What Makes A Good Editor?

April 12, 2011

By Guest Blogger Jami Carpenter

Every editor needs a good toolbox. Photo by Stitch.

I was once asked what – or rather, who – makes a good editor, which raised a good question, one that took considerable thought. I have come to the conclusion that three elements are essential to an editor’s success: a skill set, a tool set, and a mind set.

Not surprising, an editor must be knowledgeable of and proficient in the rules of good grammar, punctuation, spelling, and so forth. A strong foundation in the basics is certainly helpful, but even if an editor didn’t win the spelling bee state championship or get straight A’s in high school English, these skills can still be developed through education: writing courses; a degree in journalism or English literature; an internship with a magazine, newspaper, or book publisher (or ad agency/marketing firm); and reading — anything and everything. Seeing how the masters wrote as well as how current bestselling authors challenge old-school writing is invaluable in developing an editor’s competency.

Realistically, though, an editor — novice or veteran — cannot know and remember all the rules of grammar, which makes reference material (the “tool set”) so necessary. Whether on the bookshelf or online, a dictionary, thesaurus, writing guide, and editor manual is a must. In addition to the latest editions of Webster’s dictionary and Roget’s thesaurus, I have the Chicago Manual of Style, Patricia T. O’Conner’s Woe is I, and Karen E. Gordon’s The Deluxe Transitive Vampire at my fingertips. The Grammar Girl at grammar.quickanddirtytips.com is bookmarked on my laptop. A veritable plethora of helpful material is available; even after several years of editing experiences and many years as a high school English teacher, I continue to use outside resources.

Perhaps most critical is the editor’s mindset; that is, the ability not only to be detail-oriented, consistent, and thorough, but the ability to enjoy the process — the plodding, unglamorous nature of the work itself. An editor takes great pleasure in finding an errant comma, a dangling participle, an absent apostrophe; appreciates a perfectly-worded sentence; and is willing to dedicate time and thought to improving awkward and cumbersome text.

Many people have the skills to correct and revise material, but not everyone has the desire to sit for hours and pour over page after page with a magnifying glass. I say this not to discourage potential editors (there is plenty of work for everyone), but to remind that editing can be grueling and unpleasant for those who are not well-suited to the job. Like working on a jigsaw puzzle, editing takes patience and perseverance; the challenge of finishing the manuscript (or completing the puzzle) thrills me, but in truth, does not bring joy to all.

And challenging it is! An editor walks a fine line between correcting and revising a writer’s work, while at the same time maintaining the writer’s voice and spirit. We are tasked with helping an author tell his tale more effectively, yet must remain mindful that the story is not ours. In addition to the standard grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization errors that we address, we are often asked to trim a wordy document, develop a skimpier manuscript, provide commentary, suggest improvements, and still be cognizant of the original storyline and author’s style.

When I first began editing (not counting the years as an English teacher correcting and commenting on my high school students’ assignments), I was hired to proofread, which meant sticking to the basics — no revisions or changes beyond looking for common, flagrant mistakes. Once I had developed self-confidence and a level of competency with publishers, I was given greater flexibility in editing. It was exciting to be able to offer my own analysis and contribute to manuscript development and to form relationships, even friendships, with writers.

But it is also a greater responsibility, which must not be taken lightly. Writers are entrusting their “babies” into our care, and as editors, we would be wise to respect and honor this privilege. We must acknowledge the fact that without writers, there would be no use for us! We must take care to do our best. And like good plastic surgery, our best work is seamless and invisible.

Jami Carpenter is a freelance book editor who works directly with authors and publishers to get manuscripts ready for primetime. She does all types of editing from developmental (helps an author craft the structure and tenor of the book) to copyediting (wrangling all those errant apostrophes). As a long-time Las Vegan, she works frequently with the Las Vegas writing community and other authors from shore to shore. She lives in Bend, Oregon with her husband and an adorable kitten named what else but Webster? Reach her at www.RedPenGirl.com.


The Big Oops!

April 23, 2009

oh-no1 “Oh, no!” You know that sick feeling you get in the pit of your gut when the realization hits. You’ve just clicked “send” and you notice a glaring error. There’s no “unsend” button. No do-over. Jiminy Cricket, what to do?

This just happened to an author and myself — and it was me to blame. We’d extracted some text from her book for some magazine articles and the headline of one article says “Perfect” when it should read “Perfection”. Cripes! Should we correct and resend, thus calling attention to our goof? Or let it go, bringing up the correction during the editing/revising process?

I’ve opted for the latter in this instance.

But it begs the question, what should an author do if they notice an error after they’ve sent in a submission? My advice:

1. If the work is a submission for consideration, and the error is relatively minor, note it and let it go. Publishers and editors know that manuscripts and article copy aren’t perfect upon arrival and the errant word or punctuation goof won’t faze us, so long as the entire file isn’t rife with sloppy errors. If, on the other hand, the error is major and impacts meaning, such as a title that reads wrong because of a missing word, you’d better swallow your pride and resend with a brief note of explanation.

2. If the work is already in editing , ask your editor if they’d like to be informed as you spot a correction, or would they prefer you wait and provide them all at the same time. Some authors have driven us nuts, calling and emailing every time they notice a colon should be a semi-colon. We don’t want correx (insider shorthand) as onesie-twosies! All at once, please.

3. For a book in layout , finding a misspelling or a word here or there that needs fixing should be noted and held for proofing stage. But if the needed correx affects several lines or a whole paragraph, speak up right away. A revision like that could shift lines from one page to the next, causing a layout headache and a testy book designer.

4. If the work has reached proofreading , authors better sit up and pay attention. This is the LAST CHANCE to make sure the work is as perfect as possible. Yes, your editor will be proofing as well, and often a number of others at the publishers. The more eyes, the better, but in the end, the author should care the most and work the hardest to insure an error-free book.

You know what the baby bibs say: Stuff Happens . Take it in stride and make sure it gets fixed at the right stage of the process.